ADLP 7004 Problem Solving Through Critical Thinking

In an era of uncertainty and disruptions, being able to identify, formulate, and solve problems is a critical leadership competency. In fact, among the many facets of leadership, solving the wrong problem is among the most common, costly, and consequential. Research shows that leaders and teams end up solving the wrong problem >75% of the time. Leaders who master various thinking modes critical, strategic, and systems will significantly improve an organizations capability of solving the right problem, a strategic imperative in todays environment. Students will learn the attributes of wicked, ill-defined, complex problems and how to recognize them. This recognition is important because wicked problems are the ones that can easily spark thinking traps or cognitive fixedness - that prompt solving the wrong problem. These traps cause people to quickly think of and promote solutions to old problems rather than identify the novel elements of the problem that require different answers. Students will be equipped with tools to recognize thinking traps and intervention strategies. Also, students will learn several thinking processes and tools to formulate wicked problems comprehensively. Each thinking process is designed to specifically avoid the thinking traps and promote comprehensive formulation before trying to solve the problem. Students will have the opportunity to apply new tools and processes in real-world situations, reflect upon the results, and develop mastery in problem-solving.

Course overview

Department
Advancing Studies
School
ADV
Credits
3
Level
Graduate
Offered
Periodically

Course evaluations

Response-weighted averages from Boston College’s official course evaluations (Avalanche/Blue).

Course rating
4.68 / 5 · Excellent
90 responses
Instructor rating
4.83 / 5 · Excellent
90 responses
Terms evaluated
6
Most recent: Spring 2026

Scales: overall ratings run from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); agreement questions from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); weekly effort from 1 (up to 1 hour) to 5 (10 or more hours).

Evaluations by term and instructor
TermInstructorCourse overallInstructor overallWell organizedClear learning objectivesIntellectually challengingHelpful assignmentsApplicable beyond courseAttendance necessaryWeekly effortResponses
Spring 2026Lauren Bent4.64.74.74.94.14.54.84.27–9 hrs/week15 of 20
Fall 2025Lauren Bent4.95.04.84.84.34.64.64.54–6 hrs/week8 of 19
Summer 2025Lauren Bent4.64.94.84.74.04.64.63.61–3 hrs/week17 of 20
Spring 2025Lauren Bent4.85.05.04.94.74.94.94.54–6 hrs/week28 of 34
Fall 2024Lauren Bent4.85.04.84.84.04.84.84.61–3 hrs/week10 of 13
Summer 2024Lauren Bent4.34.34.44.44.14.34.53.64–6 hrs/week12 of 21

Data freshness

Course and evaluation data last updated 2026-10-09. Source details and limitations are documented in Data Sources and Methodology.

Instructors

  • Lauren Bent
    Spring 2026, Fall 2025, Summer 2025, Spring 2025, Fall 2024, Summer 2024 · Official rating 4.83/5