THEO 3200 Engaging Interreligious Leadership

This course engages the quest for meaning, purpose, and practical skills in interreligious engagement, building upon material learned in one of the Core courses that brings Christianity into dialogue with another tradition toward the goal of developing models of ethical interaction between religious traditions, people and experiences. Rooted in recognition that engaging religious diversity is a necessary component of training for global citizenship in the contemporary world, the course offers multiple perspectives on interreligious encounters in a variety of fields that can serve as opportunities for collective engagement toward common goals and purposes, as well as a source of conflict and violence when managed poorly, particularly in the context of other political and socio-economic concerns. The course provides theoretical background in framing interreligious engagement within the field of interreligious studies, followed by identification of best practices and community-based initiatives rooted in case studies recorded in print literature, the media, and films, and concludes with students formulating their own case studies. Topics addressed include: strategies for crafting and facilitating interreligious meeting spaces, including in education, medicine, the business world, and the public square; the role of religious identities, gender dynamics, race and racism in interreligious environments; interreligious encounters in culture and the fine arts; developments in interreligious dialogue; interreligious cooperation in addressing environmental and social justice concerns; and engagement of religions as tools for conflict resolution.

Course overview

Department
Theology
School
MCAS
Credits
3
Level
Undergraduate
Offered
Periodically

Catalog details

Satisfies core
Cultural Diversity

Catalog text is imported from the reviewed Boston College course snapshot. Confirm eligibility in EagleApps.

Requirements fulfilled

  • University Core: Cultural Diversity (All undergraduates)

Requirement eligibility can vary by school, cohort, and section. Confirm the selected section in EagleApps or with an advisor.

Course evaluations

Response-weighted averages from Boston College’s official course evaluations (Avalanche/Blue).

Course rating
4.15 / 5 · Very Good
19 responses
Instructor rating
4.32 / 5 · Very Good
19 responses
Terms evaluated
2
Most recent: Spring 2026

Scales: overall ratings run from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent); agreement questions from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree); weekly effort from 1 (up to 1 hour) to 5 (10 or more hours).

Evaluations by term and instructor
TermInstructorCourse overallInstructor overallWell organizedClear learning objectivesIntellectually challengingHelpful assignmentsApplicable beyond courseAttendance necessaryWeekly effortResponses
Spring 2026Daniel Joslyn-Siemiatkoski3.84.04.14.33.94.24.64.01–3 hrs/week12 of 18
Spring 2025Natana J DeLong-Bas4.74.94.64.54.44.75.04.71–3 hrs/week7 of 7

Data freshness

Course and evaluation data last updated 2026-10-09. Source details and limitations are documented in Data Sources and Methodology.

Instructors

Sections

  • Section 01
    Spring 2027 · Natana J DeLong-Bas · Stokes Hall 461S MWF 12:00 Noon-12:50PM · Offered